Ich denke - also bin
ich nicht Summary
in English
The doctrine prevailing in anti-Semitism research
today, as put forward by Jacob Katz (From Prejudice
to Destruction, Anti-Semitism, 1700-1933, 1980)
for instance, says: it is the Christian religion which is
to blame even for modern anti-Semitism, which has begun
around 1870 in Germany and Europe. I want to make a point
for a much more plausible thesis: Modern anti-Semitism results
from the German idealism, from which the German political
Right developed a national ideology or Weltanschauung during the 19th century. In this process it deliberately
eliminated the moral character from Kants pacifistic
philosophy. To be precise, the loss of moral contents already
begun with Kants successors - and here we have to
name even big names such as Fichte, Schopenhauer, Feuerbach,
Marx and Nietzsche.
Only Schopenhauer, Hitlers favourite philosopher,
was an anti-Semitic. Yet, all the thinkers named above developed
aversions against Jews. Why?
The German philosophy - as the young Marx has seen most
clearly - can be interpreted as an intellectual revolution
against God, i.e. against the - originally Jewish - creator
of the world and the supreme moral legislator. This intellectual
revolution took place in the 18th and 19th century in the
whole of the occidental world, the Anglo-Saxon philosophy
included, but nowhere was it as radical as in Germany. This
is why the decisive thought of German philosophy, that the
will is autonomous in the field of morality, cannot
be adequately expressed in the English language, because
it says: It is neither God nor society, but das Ich which imposes on itself the general moral law. There is
no equivalent for das Ich in the English language
- the I or the me or the ego would
be utterly artificial constructs and not identical with das Ich. The German language possesses a higher ability
of abstraction than the English language - but in this there
is also a danger, which we will se in just a moment.
Fichte, who put his philosophy at the service of the wars
against Napoleon, has laid the foundation for the völkische Ideology of the German political Right as early as 1808,
in his Reden an die deutsche Nation - a foundation
which was to remain alive through the Alldeutscher Verband up to Hitler. Yet Fichte - disregarding a few sins of his
youth - was not an anti-Semitic. But with Nationalism on
the rise a fatal development started in Germany - probably
unrecognised to a large extend by most intellectuals. Central
theses of the German idealism were tuned up
by obscure thinkers, and their ideas would not remain without
resonance in the public. The result: Kants original
intentions were twisted by 180 degrees. Eugen Duehring,
the first Rassenantisemit, was the first to put a
spin on the metaphysical freedom of will in
the Kant sense - changing it to imply that the will of the
teutonic Germans would break every resistance. And the Rassenantisemit
H.St. Chamberlain has deleted in his Grundlagen
des XIX. Jahrhunderts the word general from Kants
teaching, which maintain, as stated before, that it is das
Ich which imposes on itself the general moral
law. What was left, now reads: The wild Teuton, whose ancestors
have spread fear and terror (furor teutonicus) in
the Roman Empire as early as 100 BC, should create his own
barbaric moral law.
This is what enabled Goebbels to announce in his well known
speech Do you want total war? on February
18th of 1943, i.e. after the capitulation of Stalingrad,
that the wild (with which he means: barbaric, criminal)
will of the German would break any resistance - if it is
not undermined by the Jew, that is.
Why it was The Jew who appeared as the one subverting
the German will, was evident:
Jews were considered cowards - in spite of all statistics
about soldiers killed in WWI. According to Treitschke, who
took up a prejudice from Kant, Jews represented a people
which had not yet gathered the moral power of founding a
state, i.e. was not ready to go to war.
Jews stood for moral scruples - for instance, to kill inferior
life - this can be gleaned from a warning in a 1937
edition of the SS newspaper The Black Corps.
After all, the commandment Thou shall not kill! originates from the Hebrew Bible.
The fact that all those connections have not been recognised
until today has mainly two reasons: First, German Philosophers,
for fear of being censored by their Christian governments
(among other motives), have called their anti-Christian
doctrines Christian philosophies - this holds
true for Kant, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. This is a reason
why Jews as non-Christians have - automatically, in a sense
- been segregated from the Volksgemeinschaft even
by anti-Christian German publishers, who declared the Christian
German idealism as the German Staatsphilosophie.
Secondly, the social consequences of the German philosophy
have not been discussed until today.
Translated by Dr. Herbert Renz-Polster
zurück zum Seitenanfang